🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are pouring enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing their own AI models. From the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are competing to develop AI that understands local languages and local customs.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This trend is a component of a broader worldwide race led by tech giants from the US and China. While companies like OpenAI and a social media giant pour enormous capital, developing countries are additionally taking sovereign bets in the AI field.

But amid such vast amounts involved, is it possible for developing states attain meaningful benefits? As noted by a specialist from an influential policy organization, “Unless you’re a affluent nation or a major company, it’s a substantial hardship to develop an LLM from scratch.”

National Security Considerations

Many nations are unwilling to rely on external AI systems. In India, for instance, US-built AI tools have occasionally been insufficient. A particular case featured an AI assistant employed to instruct students in a distant area – it spoke in the English language with a strong Western inflection that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional listeners.

Additionally there’s the state security dimension. For the Indian military authorities, employing specific international systems is seen as unacceptable. As one founder commented, There might be some arbitrary data source that could claim that, oh, Ladakh is separate from India … Employing that particular AI in a defence setup is a serious concern.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with people who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they prefer not to rely on Western platforms because information may be transferred outside the country, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Projects

As a result, a number of countries are funding national initiatives. An example this initiative is being developed in the Indian market, in which a firm is attempting to create a domestic LLM with government support. This initiative has allocated approximately a substantial sum to machine learning progress.

The developer envisions a model that is more compact than leading tools from US and Chinese corporations. He states that India will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with talent. Based in India, we lack the option of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we vie against say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is pumping in? I think that is where the key skills and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Native Priority

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is backing language models trained in local regional languages. Such languages – including Malay, Thai, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and more – are commonly underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are developing these sovereign AI tools were aware of how rapidly and the speed at which the frontier is progressing.

A senior director involved in the initiative explains that these systems are designed to enhance larger models, instead of replacing them. Systems such as ChatGPT and Gemini, he comments, commonly struggle with regional languages and local customs – interacting in unnatural the Khmer language, for instance, or suggesting non-vegetarian meals to Malaysian users.

Creating local-language LLMs permits local governments to incorporate cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a sophisticated technology developed in other countries.

He adds, I am cautious with the term independent. I think what we’re attempting to express is we wish to be more adequately included and we aim to comprehend the abilities” of AI platforms.

Cross-Border Cooperation

Regarding states trying to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s a different approach: team up. Experts connected to a well-known university recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative allocated across a group of developing countries.

They call the initiative “Airbus for AI”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s successful play to develop a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. This idea would see the establishment of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the assets of several states’ AI projects – including the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a competitive rival to the American and Asian major players.

The primary researcher of a report setting out the proposal states that the idea has attracted the consideration of AI leaders of at least several countries up to now, along with several state AI companies. While it is now focused on “mid-sized nations”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, In today’s climate, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the commitments of the existing White House. Individuals are wondering for example, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? In case they choose to